Identify Security Bugs. Enforce Controls.


Combining code review with runtime testing provides stronger assurance for critical applications.


Secure Code Review


Cryptika | Vulnerability Management Service

Application weaknesses are not always visible from external testing. Some risks sit inside source code, authorization logic, data handling routines, cryptographic use, error handling, dependencies, and developer decisions.

Cryptika’s Secure Code Review service helps organizations identify security weaknesses in application code and translate findings into practical remediation guidance for development teams.

Methodology Basis

The work may use OWASP ASVS, secure coding practices, language-specific risk patterns, dependency review, and application threat modeling. The exact approach depends on whether the review is full-scope, module-specific, risk-based, or remediation-focused.



What Secure Code Review Covers

A secure code review examines selected source code, configuration files, security-relevant functions, authentication flows, authorization logic, data validation routines, API handlers, sensitive data processing, cryptographic implementation, error handling, session behavior, logging, and dependency use.

The review may be manual, tool-assisted, or combined with SAST results depending on the engagement objective and codebase size.

Why Organizations Need It

Penetration testing shows what can be observed and exploited from a running application. Code review helps identify root causes and hidden flaws that may not be reachable during black-box testing. It is especially valuable for critical applications, custom business logic, financial transactions, sensitive data processing, and high-risk API functionality.


Book a Scoping Call

Review the application type, programming languages, repository access, sensitive modules, and reporting expectations with Cryptika.


Book a Call!

How Cryptika Performs the Review

Cryptika starts by confirming the application scope, repository access method, supported languages, sensitive modules, coding framework, architecture, authentication model, data flows, and reporting expectations.

The review focuses on security-relevant code paths rather than reading every line equally. Findings are tied to affected files, functions, logic paths, risk scenarios, and recommended fixes so developers can act quickly.

Typical Review Triggers
  • Pre-release assurance for a critical application.
  • Security review after major code changes.
  • Investigation of repeated application vulnerabilities.
  • Regulatory, customer, or internal audit requests for secure development evidence.
  • Review of authentication, authorization, payment, claims, wallet, or transaction logic.
  • Validation before acquiring or integrating a third-party application.
What the Client Should Prepare

The client should prepare repository access, architecture notes, build instructions if needed, dependency manifests, relevant environment configuration, sensitive module list, developer contacts, test accounts where useful, and any prior SAST, DAST, or penetration testing results.



Cryptika Governance, Risk and Compliance Consulting Services

Expected Deliverables
  • Secure code review report.
  • Findings mapped to files, modules, functions, or logic flows.
  • Risk rating and exploitation scenario.
  • Developer-ready remediation guidance.
  • Secure design observations where relevant.
  • Optional review of remediation changes.


    Common Standards and Regulations

    Secure code review can support secure SDLC expectations, OWASP ASVS alignment, PCI DSS application security requirements, ISO/IEC 27001 control validation, and client-specific release assurance needs.

    FAQ

    Is secure code review manual or automated?

    It can be manual, tool-assisted, or combined. Critical logic often needs human review even when scanning tools are used.

    Do developers receive remediation guidance?

    Yes. Findings should include clear technical recommendations that developers can use during remediation.

    Can code review be combined with penetration testing?

    Yes. Combining code review with runtime testing provides stronger assurance for critical applications.



    Cryptika SOC as a Service

    Scope Caution

    Secure code review depends on the code provided, supported languages, repository access, build context, and agreed review depth. It does not replace runtime testing or production security monitoring.

      Get started now

      Cryptika services and solutions complements the speed of deployment, unparalleled scalability, and accuracy. Together, they help you identify the highest priorities and accelerate your ability to fix potential security holes before they can be breached.

      Submit a form, our representative will reach to you, bringing our phenomenal support!

      Get Quote!

      Contact us

      #15 Wakalat Street, Al-Swiefieh, Amman, Jordan 962 6 2000 289 [email protected]